Do scientists use radiometric dating

Rated 4.29/5 based on 577 customer reviews

As stated previously, carbon dating cannot be used on artifacts over about 50,000 years old.

These artifacts have gone through many carbon-14 half-lives, and the amount of carbon-14 remaining in them is miniscule and very difficult to detect.

The age of the carbon in the rock is different from that of the carbon in the air and makes carbon dating data for those organisms inaccurate under the assumptions normally used for carbon dating.

This restriction extends to animals that consume seafood in their diet.

This technique is not restricted to bones; it can also be used on cloth, wood and plant fibers.

This human nuclear activity will make precise dating of fossils from our lifetime very difficult due to contamination of the normal radioisotope composition of the earth with addition artificially produced radioactive atoms.Any radiometric dates that show a supposedly “old” rock to be young are rejected “Few people realize that the index fossil dating system, despite its poor assumptions and many problems, is actually the primary dating tool for geologic time. In other words, radiometric dating methods are actually fit into the geological column, which was set up by [index] fossil dating over 100 years ago.”(Michael Oard, meteorologist and creationist scientist, 1984) All radiometric dating methods use this basic principle to extrapolate the age of artifacts being tested.These long time periods are computed by measuring the ratio of daughter to parent substance in a rock, and inferring an age based on this ratio.Scientists attempt to check the accuracy of carbon dating by comparing carbon dating data to data from other dating methods.Other methods scientists use include counting rock layers and tree rings.

Leave a Reply